Author Archive for howajan

29
Apr

Laughter is Truly Contagious

At UCL scientists discovered that when you hear someone laugh it triggers a response in your brain. Dr. Sophie Scott says, “We’ve known for some time now that when we are talking to someone, we often mirror their behavior, copying the words they use and mimicking their gestures. Now we’ve shown that the same appears to apply to laughter, too — at least at the level of the brain.”
The team did a series of tests involving a lot of volunteers to which they played a series of sounds to while their brain was hooked up to a fMRI scanner. They used sounds of laughter, triumph, screaming, retching… All of the sounds triggered a response in the premotor cortical region of the brain, which led to the muscles in the face responding accordingly.
Which is shy when we see/ hear laughter we smile and when we see/hear anger we either frown or loose expression.
So smiling at people really does effect them maybe you should try it, walk down the hall and smile and see count how many people smile, and then walk down the hall frowning and see how many people frown.
Questions: Do you think that laughter is contagious? If someone laughs do you laugh to? Do you think frowning has an effect?

Site: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061212213922.htm

27
Apr

Smelling Kills You Faster

Scott Pletcher, a molecular biologist from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, conducted an experiment that held some interesting results. Pletcher experimented on fruit flies and found that by eliminating their sense of smell the flies actually lived a 20% longer lifespan than their peers. It sounds pretty strange, but Scientists have linked the sense of smell with aging. They have also linked food with aging. They found that if a monkey, mouse, yeast, and people, consume less food than they have a longer lifespan, and it lessens the chances of disease.
The odd thing about this experiment was that the change in smell only affected the female fruit flies. Pletcher and his crew haven’t been able to figure out why it was only the females that live longer. They did find that it was the smell of CO2 that causes a rapid aging in fruit flies and they want to discover what specific smell causes it in mammals.

Questions: Do you think this is possible that the smell of a certain thing actually causes you to age? And if it does than what smell do you think causes people to age?

Site: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18800-sense-of-smell-makes-flies-time-fly.html

27
Apr

The taste of bubbles

Everyone loves pop rocks, soda, anything fizzy or bubbly. There fun and when you eat/drink anything that’s bubbly it makes you feel like a kid. Contrary to popular belief the feeling of bubbles popping on your tongue is not a sensation from touch nerve receptors, but it is in fact a taste. Although it’s hard to understand how this could happen scientists at Columbia State University have discovered how the taste of bubbles works. They conducted an experiment on mice.

They had five groups of mice all genetically engineered to be missing one taste sensor. One couldn’t taste sweet, one couldn’t taste sour, one couldn’t taste umami, …salt, or bitterness. When given carbon dioxide, only four groups reacted. The one that didn’t react was the group that couldn’t taste sour. Which led Zuker and his team at Columbia State University to study the sour taste bud, on which they found a protein attached to it which is crucial to the taste of Carbon dioxide. When you drink/ eat something with carbon dioxide the protein on the sour taste bud knocks off protons, which stimulate the sour taste bud. So the taste of bubbles really is the feeling of the protons being knocked off and then the stimulation of the sour taste bud.

Questions: What do you think, do you think that bubbles popping on your tongue is really just a taste and not a touch? Or do you think different bubbles are different such as pop rocks, versus soda, which is already fizzy?

Site: http://www.sciencenewsforkids.org/articles/20091021/Note3.asp

04
Mar

Our brain destroys our Memories

From: http://hsc.unm.edu/som/psychiatry/neuro/images/brain.jpg

From: http://hsc.unm.edu/som/psychiatry/neuro/images/brain.jpg

Did you know that when we learn things our brain makes us forget it, on purpose. Our short-term memory and little details we forget are all part of our brains network. You know how sometimes you forget something that just happened. Or how everyone remembers something a little different. Such as if there’s an accident and there’s 20 witnesses none of them are going to remember the exact same thing, because as soon as they saw something there brain began making them forget things which id did not find to be important. The thing that makes you forget so much is a little protein called Rac.
This research was found by a group of researchers from several universities around China. They found this out by testing flies with smells, when the protein Rac was blocked the flies retained their memories longer. They also discovered that cases such as mental retardation have to do with mutations in the Rac pathway.
I never knew that our brain deleted our own memories. In fact I don’t think I ever thought about why we loose our short-term memory.

Have you ever had a problem from you Rac deleting your memories? What do you think it would be like if we had no Rac and remembered every little detail imaginable?

Site: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100218125149.htm

14
Feb

Fish = the new superhero

You’ve heard the saying an apple a day keeps the doctor away, but what about a fish a day keeps the insane at bay. If you eat fish oil you are less likely to become psychotic. That’s probably the biggest boost you have heard all day, as we are from a fishing town where our chance at becoming psychotic can be reduced immensely everyday.

Scientists; G. Paul Amminger, M.D., of Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia, conducted an experiment on 81 individuals that either had a huge history of psychotic disorders in their family or had the first few symptoms of psychotic behavior. Over the course of 12 weeks 41 of the individuals were given a capsule of fish oil and 40 were given placebo capsules. By the end of the experiment 76 people were left standing. 4.9% of the people who had taken the fish oil capsules and 27.5 % of the group that had taken the placebo capsules were transitioned into psychotic disorder. That’s a difference of 26.6 % difference. They have found a natural substance that may prevent or at least delay psychotic disorders.

Questions: Do you believe that fish oil can really make a difference? After reading this do you suddenly have a new found appreciation for fish, and a desire to eat more fish?

Site: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100201171521.htm

09
Dec

Less likely to get hurt at summer camp?? What?

Normally when people think of summer camp among other things they think of cutting yourselves with a knife, stepping on a glass bottle in the sand, burning themselves while roasting marshmallows, tripping over a rock and scraping their knee. Although children get injured all the time, a child is less likely to get injured at summer camp than if they didn’t go to summer camp. Regularly children run around, get dirty and end up stubbing their toe or getting hurt daily, but statistics show children are less likely to get injured at summer camp.

The number of injuries of children playing on the playground and those of children playing sports surpass those of children at summer camp. The statistics of children injuring themselves prove this, its safer for a kid to be at camp, except for if a child is at a camp that lasts longer than 2 weeks. Children at summer camp for longer than 2 weeks are more likely to get injured than those playing sports or swinging at the swings on the playground.

This is very interesting who would of thought summer camp was a better plastic bubble than being at home. Do you think this applies to everyone, Is this study accurate? If you believe it accurate why would a child be less likely to get hurt at summer camp?

The site with this information:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091208162829.htm

29
Nov

You Can’t Catch Me I’m the Gingerbread Man!!

Among other innocent things Gingerbread man are though of as harmless decorations and delicious cookies. But as cute as little gingerbread men and other such Christmas tree decorations are, they are terribly toxic. Bill Doucette and his team of researchers of Utah State University found this when Hill Air Force Base in Salt Lake City Utah had found high levels of dichloroethane and trichloroethylene (or DCA and TCE) in the air. Which was later found to have contaminated a groundwater reservoir. They were put on the investigation and after installing vapor removal systems that didn’t seem to be working did they pinpoint the place of the problem at the certain homes that these machines didn’t seem to work at. They went into the houses expecting to find some toxic household cleaners but it wasn’t so. They sampled the air in each room and found a basement that was packed with DCA. They emptied the room and put everything in the garage. They watched as in a few days the DCA levels from 82 micrograms per cubic meter down to 0.37 while the air in the garage went to undetectable levels 10 μg/m3. (yah it doesn’t make any sense to me either, but its undetectable.) After a while they found it to be in plastic gingerbread ornaments and other such Christmas tree decorations.

DCA is a toxin that is threatening to ones health if exposed to it for too long a period of time. High levels of DCA is a national problem it’s everywhere and it only takes one little gingerbread man to make the level of the air too high.

Do you have an unknown toxic gingerbread man? Do you think any other festive ornaments could be secretly toxic? Is it more dangerous that something as innocent as a gingerbread man is toxic more than if say a plastic snake was toxic?

For the site:

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/49897/title/Case_of_the_toxic_gingerbread_man

15
Nov

….Phobia….

Everyone is afraid of something. A phobia of some kind, in a recent survey of Americans this is what they found. From numbers 1-10, 10 being the least of the top phobias and 1 being the scariest thing to Americans today.

Number 10

The fear of going to the Dentist:  Although I think the dentist office smells so bad that it makes me want to puke most people have other thoughts about it. About 14.5 percent of Americans are completely afraid of going to the dentist. They will wait until the pain is so excruciating that someone else has to drag them there, before they step foot into that office. This is mainly due to a previous terrible experience with the dentist or just the fear of the idea of having a bunch of shiny tools in your mouth that can cause you great pain. This fear is called dental phobia.

Number 9

The fear of Dogs:  People deeply suffering from cynophobia may run at the site of a Chihuahua. As funny as this seems, its actually kind of sad. It can develop from being bitten by a dog or witnessing someone else getting bitten. Or you could just never of been near a dog and have no idea how to act around them.

Number 8

The fear of flying:  The Odds of dieing in a car crash are 1:100, the odds of dieing from heart disease are 1:5, and the odds of in a plane crash are 1:20,000. As extremely in favor of the safety of flying compared to driving a car and happening to get a disease there are still 25 million people in the U.S.A. who suffer from aviophobia and will never at all costs get into a plane. The reasons are the fear of dieing in a plane crash and claustrophobia.

Number 7

The fear of Thunder and Lightening:  Severe Weather Phobia holds 73% of the populace of a college in a panic. These people are just afraid they’re palms sweat, their heart rate increases, they may have meltdowns when they come into contact with thunder and lightening.

Number 6

The fear of the dark:  Every kid has had nightmares of some creepy goblin creature coming out and attacking them as soon as the lights go out. But is this fear grows to extremes and stays with them it is soon called nyctophobia.

Number 5

The fear of heights:  Not to be confused with Mrs. Heitz. Acrophobia holds most the populace. If looking off a tall building freaks you out and you want to grab onto something it means you have this phobia.

Number 4

The fear of people:  This is social phobia. It’s the fear of public speaking and not only that but just speaking in front of a few people. Symptoms of this fear include blushing, shaking, stuttering, or just the feeling of wanting to hide in a hole. It’s very common. Most people have this.

Number 3

The fear of no escape:  Not everyone can be a Houdini. 1.8 million Americans suffer from agoraphobia. Its like claustrophobia, except it doesn’t even have to be a small room. People with this fear avoid places like elevators, sporting events, bridges, public transportation, driving, shopping malls and airplanes. They rarely leave their home, do not like traveling in cars and hate crowded areas with a passion.

Number 2

The fear of spiders:  Arachnophobia can be intense. Screaming at the site of a giant spider such as that in Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings is understandable. But Arachnophobia can get intense to the point of screaming at a picture of a spider.

The Number 1

The fear of snakes:  Most people are afraid of snakes. Ophidiophobia is understandable too because researchers say that it may be imprinted into our very nature. One that was extremely helpful during the Stone Age, a very important contributing fact to our survival as humans.

Well there you have it. Everyone is afraid of something, are you afraid of any of the top ten? What do you think would be number eleven on the list of phobias?

To visit the site I got my information from see:

http://www.livescience.com/culture/091023-top10-fear.html

16
Oct

LIPOSUCTION LEFTOVERS MAKE ORGANS

Liposuctions are for getting rid of fat, but scientists have now turned fat into stem cells to make organs. How does that work? Well, I don’t really know, but Scientists such as Joseph Wu, have done it. Previous to this scientists have turned skin cells into stem cells but now they have discovered that using fat cells is “twice as fast and about 20 times more efficient,” as Joseph Wu explained. They start by reprogramming the cells which are then called pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells. Those cells are capable of turning into most cells in the human body. Scientists want to use these worthless fatty leftovers to study diseases and grow new tissue and replacement organs.
It is quite a science to do this. I would of never of been so creative as to use leftover liposuction fat to come up with a way to create stem cells. Of course I probably would never of though of turning anything into a stem cell. Oh and just so you know anyone can get a liposuction and get replacement organs and tissue for themselves, its not just a thing for people suffering from obesity, why even Sandy could do it.
Using Fat for stem cells kind of grosses me out, but how about you? Would you be willing to go get a liposuction so that scientists could create an organ for you and then actually be ready for them to put it inside you? I mean think about it, whatever organ they just made for you is totally and completely from your fat.

Here’s the site I used:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/09/090908-liposuction-leftovers-fat-stem-cells.html

11
Oct

God Made Dirt So Dirt Don’t Hurt

800px-Elephant_dust_bath_park_w_niger

A handful of dirt can contain 10,000 species of bacteria, so what if they told you antibodies were could be made from dirt. Dirt is disgusting packed full of bacteria but it has been the key to finding the antibodies to fight against that bacteria. We have only been using 1% of those microbial bugs to make antibodies. That is because Scientists have found it difficult to analyze the DNA on the other 99% of the microbial bugs. Researchers at Rockefeller University have been able to extract the genetic material from dirt and have been able to analyze the DNA, so now they can have access to many previously unknown organic compounds. They have already found two potential antibiotics.

Over time bacteria grows and changes providing resistance to antibodies, but at the same time bacteria can be monitored so that new antibodies can be produced. These researchers at the Rockefeller University have found a way to find the DNA codes so that they can make an antibody against it. This is really a break though for science because before this scientists have only had antibodies for 1% of the bacteria but now they can have it for much more.

What do you think? Will scientists ever be able to find antibodies for even at least 10% of the bacterium? Bacteria is always growing and evolving so do you think its even worth it to track bacteria and try to come up with new antibodies all the time?

To Visit my site:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081111211446.htm